← Projects
Project case study

Genome-edited porcine embryos

A translational large-animal program using IVF, embryo culture, CRISPR/Cas systems, and molecular validation to support porcine disease-model research.

Overview

This project sat at the practical center of porcine reproductive biotechnology: producing developmentally competent embryos, applying genome-editing systems, and validating the embryo-level work needed before large-animal models can become useful translational research tools. It connected routine IVF and embryo culture skill with the more demanding question of how edited embryos can support disease-model design.

What it demonstrates
IVF
Embryo production platform for porcine model work
CRISPR/Cas
Genome-editing systems applied to large-animal embryos
Validation
Molecular checks linking embryo work to model design
Blastocysts
Culture conditions connected to later publication work
Case notes
Background

Large-animal models depend on reproductive work that happens first.

Before a genome-edited pig can become a disease model, the project needs reliable oocyte handling, IVF, embryo culture, editing delivery, and validation. This work treated embryo production as a core translational capability rather than a technical prelude.

Role

The contribution was senior bench work across embryo and editing workflows.

My role focused on reproductive biotechnology execution: supporting embryo production, culture decisions, genome-editing workflows, and the interpretation of embryo-development outcomes in relation to downstream animal-model goals.

Method

The project joined embryo culture with genome-editing validation.

The work combined porcine IVF, in vitro embryo culture, CRISPR/Cas-based editing, and molecular validation. That combination made the project both developmental biology and translational infrastructure.

Meaning

It shaped later work on extended blastocyst culture and model reliability.

The same embryo-culture questions carried into the FBS blastocyst culture publication: if embryos are the starting material for model development, then culture conditions, viability, and developmental competence are central evidence, not background methods.

Research logic
01

Produce embryos

Use porcine oocyte maturation, IVF, and culture workflows to generate embryos suitable for downstream editing and assessment.

02

Apply editing systems

Introduce CRISPR/Cas strategies within the constraints of embryo handling, viability, and developmental timing.

03

Validate outcomes

Connect embryo development and molecular validation so edited embryos can be interpreted as credible model-building material.

04

Refine culture evidence

Use embryo-culture observations to guide later questions about extended blastocyst viability and defined supplement comparisons.

Research highlights
  • Contributed to NRF-funded translational animal-model research using porcine reproductive biotechnology.
  • Supported workflows spanning IVF, in vitro embryo culture, genome editing, and molecular validation.
  • Connected embryo-production reliability with the practical requirements of large-animal disease-model development.
  • Carried embryo-culture questions forward into first-author extended blastocyst culture work.
Related trail
  • The 2026 FBS blastocyst culture article builds directly on the need to preserve embryo viability during extended in vitro culture.
  • The 2025 KSARB poster previewed the supplement-comparison work before publication.
  • The CRISPR animal-model review provides a broader translational frame for genome-edited pigs.
Related outputs
Publication2026 FBS porcine blastocyst culture article->Publication2025 CRISPR animal models review->TalkKSARB 2025 blastocyst culture poster->