Loading
A reading log on Benjamin Hardy's Be Your Future Self Now, and what it asked me to do with the next five years.
I read Benjamin Hardy's Be Your Future Self Now during a stretch when my planning had quietly shrunk. As a lab-based graduate researcher, most of my attention goes into the week in front of me: which experiment runs tomorrow, which reagent has to be ordered, which deadline is closest. I had become good at the week and bad at the decade. The book's premise is that this is exactly the wrong proportion, and it made the case well enough that I want to write down what stayed with me.
Hardy's central claim is simple to state and harder to live by: your future self determines your present, not the other way around. We tend to imagine that today's effort accumulates into some eventual result, and that the result is a reward waiting at the end. He inverts it. The person you intend to become is the thing that gives today its meaning. A present choice is not neutral until proven useful later; it either moves you toward that future self or away from it, right now.
I found this more persuasive than the usual productivity framing because it treats the future as an identity rather than a to-do list. The book organizes itself around three movements, and I will keep them general rather than pretend I memorized every subheading. First, a set of threats to the future self. Second, a set of truths about it. Third, a set of steps for closing the distance.
The threats are mostly failures of connection. Hopelessness about the future drains meaning out of the present. A negative story about the past quietly caps what you believe is possible. Being unaware of your environment lets you drift. Being disconnected from your future self makes short-sighted decisions feel reasonable. Urgent problems and small goals become anchors that hold you in place. Avoiding reality guarantees the outcome you were avoiding. And, in a line I keep returning to, success itself can become the cause of a later failure, because it tempts you to stop investing.
The truths are the counterweight. The one I underlined hardest is that investment compounds, so returns arrive exponentially rather than evenly, which means the early years feel unrewarding and the patience is the whole point. Another is that a vivid picture of the future self works best when it is paired with something measurable and a clear near-term goal, so that the vision does not stay a daydream. And there is a deliberately uncomfortable claim: failing while acting as your future self is worth more than succeeding as your present self, because the first is aimed and the second is only busy.
The steps, which I will not recite mechanically, are about clarity and completion. Define the goal, remove what is not essential, move from what you need toward what you aspire to and then toward what you actually know, ask directly for what you want, build systems instead of relying on will, take control of your own schedule, and finish aggressively rather than perfectly. Reading them, I recognized how much of my time gets spent perfecting things that did not need to be perfect and how little gets spent finishing things that did.
The honest obstacle in my life is not motivation. It is that a laboratory does not respect a plan. Experiments fail and have to be repeated. Administrative tasks arrive without warning. A day I had assigned to writing becomes a day of troubleshooting a protocol. Hardy would say that this is exactly why the future self has to be held deliberately in view, because the daily current will otherwise carry you wherever it happens to be going. So my first practical response was unglamorous: use my tools to remind me of my longer goals on a regular schedule, so the vision does not get buried under whatever is loudest that morning.
Then I did what the book asks and named a small number of concrete aims for the year rather than a vague intention to work hard.
The first is research. I want to bring one project through as first author, and I want a second project far enough along that it is producing results rather than promises. This is the part of the future self that is closest and most measurable, and it is where compounding is most visible: the papers I finish now are the foundation everything later stands on.
The second is teaching. I want to know my subject, obstetrics and reproduction, thoroughly enough to teach it well, which means working through it from the textbook up rather than relying on the fragments I already carry. I also want to build a chatbot that can help students study the material, partly to serve them and partly because building a thing is how I find out whether I actually understand it.
The third is artificial intelligence. I have coursework I kept deferring, and I want to finish it. Beyond the coursework, I want to apply deep learning inside my own research and to systematize how I organize and retrieve papers, so that my reading turns into a structure I can build on rather than a pile I re-read.
The book kept pressing me to picture the future self in a specific year, so I did the arithmetic. Graduation in the summer of 2027, then my alternative service through the summer of 2028. By December of 2029 I should either be finishing a postdoctoral fellowship abroad or standing at the start of a faculty position. When I try to see the person in that year clearly, he is a veterinarian who is also a researcher, someone who teaches students and who advances animal welfare through questions he chose himself rather than questions handed to him.
I noticed that the picture is not only professional. The version of me I want to meet has kept himself physically strong and has collected enough varied experience to have something to say, because a person who only ever worked has a thin store of stories to teach from. That detail felt important precisely because it is the kind of thing the daily current erodes first.
If I am honest, my working assumption for years was the plain one: work hard and results will follow. The book did not tell me to abandon effort. It told me that effort without a destination is just motion, and that the destination has to be a person, not a prize. The shift is small to describe and large to practice. I am now trying to connect each present action to who I am becoming, and I am building in reflection at every scale, daily and weekly and monthly and quarterly and yearly, instead of my old habit of setting goals once in January and never checking them again.
I remain a little wary of the genre. Books like this can flatter you into feeling transformed by an afternoon of reading. But the test is not the feeling. The test is whether, five years from now, the person I described here is recognizably the one who shows up. I wrote this partly so that he has no excuse to forget.